Hoo Peninsular continued ..
been given to Development
Corporations- usually on area of land identified at the time that they are set up.
Urban regeneration has often been a goal of development corporations but other
objectives are possible. For example the Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) was set
up to manage public sector involvement in the 2012 Olympic Games to be held in
London. It is to provide the venues and infrastructure. In conjunction with the
ondon Development Agency (LDA), the ODA has powers of land acquisition, including
compulsory purchace.
The income from the sale of some assets such as the Olympic village and development
land is part of the Olympic budget: land sales have been estimated as having a value
of £1.8 billion.
In more ordinary cases, planning permission is used to finance "worthy" projects
such as new college buildings. The York Colleges' main buildings have recently been
rebuilt, in part using the money raised from the sale of its former site for domestic
housing. The added value here is, of course, the grant of planning permission that
has enhanced the value of the land. The University of York is funding building of its
new campus by using the value generated from the business parks that it constructs.
In cases such as these, the value of planning permission is tied to a worthy cause
(regeneration, the Olympics, education & etc.). These situations are proxies for
hypothecated taxes. ‘Hypothecated taxes’ is the usual term for earmarked taxes. A
development levy that must be spent on education, for example, is clearly a
hypothecated tax. The grant of planning permission for an educational purpose has
the same net effect so should be regarded as hypothecation.
Historically, hypothecation is not well regarded in certain government departments.
But hypothecation of the value created in granting planning permission does have
the advantage of being opaque. It is hard to justify saying, "York Colleges have
been awarded an extra £30 million of public funds", still harder to say, "York
University has been awarded £100 million". If such numbers appear on balance
sheets, they are not easily identified as public expenditure. This is one advantage
of using planning permission as one method to finance renewal cities.
The geographical proximity of supported causes to a particular development contributes
to opaqueness because the development
may increase the value of planning permission.
For example, the value of a business park at the University of York will be increased
because it is located in an extension to the University campus.
A renewal city will have a "community brand" that will increase its value. It will
attract inhabitants who are enthusiastic about the moral purpose of the city. In
general, people are prepared to pay more to live in an attractive environment. In
the case of a renewal city, the attractiveness of the environment will be measured
not only in terms of its physical attributes of location, layout and architecture
but in the ambience that is created by its sense of community guided moral purpose.
Local democracy and the objectives of renewal cities
Development corporations and agencies are usually place-specific but do not start
with a local democratic structure. Instead, they are founded as bodies appointed
by national government. However, after the initial development phase, it is usual
that control is passed over to local democracy.
In general, the governance of renewal cities should follow this route. The UK
government, if it has parliamentary support, can change local democratic structures.
But in allowing a transition from a development status to one governed by local
democracy, the goals of any particular renewal city should be recognised.
In the case of the Hoo Peninsula Renewal City, it would be recognised that the
government has allocated valuable resources, particularly the wealth generated
through planning permission in exchange for commitments made for the benefit of
the common good. It would be a case of moral hazard if local democratic processes
were allowed to subvert these commitments for their own gain.
Carbon Capture and Storage
The proposal for a large coal fired power station at Kingsnorth on the Medway
Estuary in Kent has engendered much criticism. In production, this power station
could provide 3.6% of the UK's electricity. However, it will also generate more
carbon dioxide than that produced by Ghana, a country of 22 million people.
Nonetheless, the greenhouse gases produced by power stations currently being built
in the USA and China will dwarf these emissions.
Website Content © 2008 RenewalCities - Web Design by Semlyen IT